In Japan, some people say that famous tourist sites, such as castles and temples, should limit the number of visitors.
Do you agree with this opinion?
Write your response in 80-100 words (=> 7-9 sentences) with two reasons.
=> TS(your response), SS-1 & SDs, SS-2 & SDs, CS
Points can be used: - Cleanliness - Local economies - Reputation
Tamaki
返信削除I agree with this opinion. First, I think people who live neat the tourist sites can’t feel comfortable by tourists. For example, they may face situations that they can’t sleep well by the noises that tourists make. Second, accept too many tourists is bad for the environment of the sites. There are some people that do bad things for the tourist sites because there’re many kinds of people in visitors. For these two reasons, I think they should limit the number of visitors.
83 words Good reasons. Add more specific examples.
削除#2 I think …=> people …
can’t feel comfortable by tourists=>
#3 accept …=>
#4 some people that => there are people who …
people in visitors<=???
#5 “they”<= who???
I agree with this opinion. First, people who live near the tourist sites feel bad by tourists. For example, they may face situations that they can’t sleep well by the noises that tourists make. Second, accepting too many tourists is bad for the environment of the sites. There are people who do bad things for the tourist sites because there’re many kinds of people who are tourists. For these two reasons, I think famous tourists sites should limit the number of tourists.
削除I agree with this opinion. I heard the news that the foreign countries did bad things on tourist sites. For instance, Chinese people kick the deer in the Nara park. Also, if all of staf in tourists sites can't communicate with foreign countries, they have to limit the number of visitors. For example, in a restaurant, they can't use a translator app and they can't speak any other languages. Something bad will happen, so they have to limit them.For these reasons, I think tourist sites should limit the number of visitors.
返信削除91 words. Think of keywords for SSs.
削除#2 What does this sentence explain? Need a SS.
#2, 4 “foreign countries”<=???
#4 all of staf=>
#5 they can’t <= really???
#6 Something bad …<= What does this sentence support???
I agree with this opinion. I heard the news that some people did bad things on tourist sites. For instance, some tourists kicked the deer in the Nara park. Also, if all staff in tourist sites can't communicate with foreigners, they have to limit the number of visitors. For example, if they can't use a translator app and they can't speak any other languages, something bad will happen, so they have to limit them. For these reasons, I think tourist sites should limit the number of visitors.
削除I agree with that opinion.
返信削除First, the famous tourist sites have traffic jams by many visitors come there.
They visit by their car or transportation.
The people live near the sites may difficult to move.
Second, it cause over-tourism, or pollute the town by visitors.
Nowadays, the manners as visitor is problem in Japan.
Some visitors throw away their garbage to the street.
I think limit the number of visitors will be a solution of that problems.
77 words. Pay attention to the verbs.
削除#2 the famous=> famous by many …=> with come there<=???
#3 visit by=> visit there transportation=> by other …
#4 people live=> may difficult to=>
#5 “it”<=? Cause=> pollute=> by visitors<=?
#6 as visitor<=??? Is this SS-2 or SD???
#7 to the street=>
#8 think limit=>
I agree with that opinion. First, the famous by many tourist sites have traffic jams because many visitors come there. They visit their there transportation by other place. If it crowded by visitors, other people will be difficult to use it. Second, coming many tourists cause over-tourism. Nowadays, Kyoto has that problem. Some visitors throw away their garbage to the street. I think limit the number of visitors will be a solution of that problems.
削除I agree that famous tourist sites, such as castles and temples, should limit the number of visitors. Too many people in tourist sities cause over tourism. If a tourist cities attract too many people, problems can caused between the people living there and the tourists. Noise from tourists cause problems with people living in the area. Also, the natural environment can be protected. Too many people increase waste and cause serious environmental problems.
返信削除73 words. Write more supporting explanation/example and a CS.
削除#2 sities=>
#3 a tourist cities attract=> problems can caused=>
#4 => For example, .. Noise=>
#5 can be protected if …
#6 Too many people increase=>
I agree that famous tourist sites, such as castles and temples, should limit the number of visitors. Too many people in tourist sities cause over tourism. If there are too many people in the tourist site, problems can caused between the people living there and the tourists. For example, noise from tourists cause problems with people living in the area. Also, the natural environment can be protected if tourist sites limit the number of tourists. People without morals increase waste and cause serious environmental problems.
削除Akinari
返信削除I agree with this opinion. If famous tourist sites limit the number of visitors, visitors can enjoy. They can see the sites at a slowly pace.
So, it is easier to take photos when there are fewer people. Also, limiting the number of visitors will reduce the amount of trash at tourist sites. Recently, there has been a problem with some tourists throwing away trash. So, reducing the number of visitors is good for the environment. By these reasons, I think famous tourist sites should limit the number of visitors.
90 words. Very well explained.
削除#2 visitors, visitors=> visitors, they …
#3 a slowly pace=>
#4 So, => Then
#5 good
#6 has been=> have been … problems
CS By=> With
このコメントは投稿者によって削除されました。
削除I agree with this opinion. I have two reasons that I think so. First, a lot of garbage remained in a tourist site if visitors increase. It could be said that nothing is more important than environment. Second, some visitors can’t enjoy themselves enough if there are too many other visitors. Also, there is a possibility that children will get lost.
返信削除Therefore, I think famous tourist sites should limit the number of visitors.
73 words. Write more explanations/examples to SSs.
削除#2 reasons that=> reasons why …
#3 remained=> if visitors increase=> if there …
#4 Write more specific explanation to #3
#5 Write another sentence to explain SS-2
I agree with this opinion. I have two reasons why I think so. First, a lot of garbage remained in a tourist site if there are many visitors. People who live near the site feel uncomfortable. It could be said that nothing is more important than environment. Second, some visitors can’t enjoy themselves enough if there are too many other visitors. Standing in a long line is boring for tourists. Also, there is a possibility that children will get lost.
削除Therefore, I think famous tourist sites should limit the number of visitors.
Shuntaro
返信削除I agree this opinion. First, the large number of visitors could make bad effects for an environment. If a lot of visitors throw away trash at the tourist sights, the environment will be polluted and the sights is broken because of them. In addition, if famous tourists sights limit the visitors, it is easy for local people to live. It is a serious problem not to live a comfortable life. Traffic jams and noises give people feel stress. In conclusion, tourist sights should limit the number of visitors.
88 words. Good points. Support SSs more clearly.
削除#1 agree this …=>
#2 for an=>
#3 sights is broken because of them<= unnecessary
#5 What does this sentence explain???
#6 give people feel stress=> make/cause …
I agree with this opinion. First, the large number of visitors could make bad effects on environment. If a lot of visitors throw away trash at the tourist sights, the environment will be polluted. In addition, if the number of visitors decrease, it will be convenient for people who live nearby the famous sight. It is a serious problem not to live a comfortable life. Traffic jams and noises make people feel stress. In conclusion, tourist sights should limit the number of visitors.
削除Shizuka
返信削除I agree with this opinion. I have two reasons for the opinion. First, if many tourists come to famous tourist sites, It get very loud there. There are not only tourists but also people who live there. They feel annoy by the noise. Second, Too many tourists cause traffic jams. They use trains and buses, so there are too crowded. It has bad effects for people who live there. I think it is good idea to limit the number of visitors. It will help people who live in near famous tourist sites from bad effects because of too many tourists.
100 words
削除It get=>
Feel annoy=>
So there are too crowded=>
Effects for=> effects on
I agree with this opinion.
返信削除First of all, these days, people who live in famaous tourist sits have many trouble.For example, if they want to ride local bus, they cannot use it because many tourists are already on borarding.Kyoto prefecture is especially bad because there is the most popular place in Japan.
Also,environment of tourist sits is polluted by throw away garbage.
It causes to support grobal warming.
For these reasons, tourists sites should limit the number of visitors.