Lesson materials, assignment and writing for MEL School students
I don't think Pistorius should be allowed to compete against able-bodied athltes.Prosthetic leg is lighter and longer than usual able-bodied leg.It's little advantage, now.But top athletes compete small thing like that.And I worried about disable runner is faster than able-bodied,and all top athletes cut there leg by there oun to run faster in the future..
Good reasoning.2. legs3,4 should be combined.5. interesting thought. Try to write as SS, not just as your worry.
I don't think Pistorius should be allowed to compete against able-bodied athltes.Prosthetic legs are lighter and longer than usual able-bodied leg.It's little advantage, now,but top athletes compete small thing like that.And it's became true if we allow him disable runner is faster than able-bodied,and all top athletes cut there leg by there oun to run faster in the future.
I don't thimk he should be allowed to compete against able-bodied athletes.Because his legs are advantage for him.He has longer and lighter legs than others and it can be some advantage.Sometimes the technology gives special and unfair power by prosthetic body parts to disabed athletes, such as him. For these reasons, I don't think he should be allowed to compete against able-bodied athletes.
Good reasoning.2. => That's because his prosthetic/artificial lges ...4. good writing but doesn't support your answer or explained in detail.
I don't think Pistorius should be allowed to compete against able-bodied atheletes.First reason is that there is a proper place for him to compete.Sports must be fairly so that they are separated in to many stages.Second, if he compete against able-bodied atheletes, it would cause arguments all over the world.To judge fairly or not is difficult.
Good structure.2. proper opportunities ...3. fairly competed in respective playing field.5. => It is so controversial that ...
I don't think Pistorius should be allowed to compete against able-bodied athletes.His prosthetic legs is not real his legs, so it could be just help to run faster.Also, there are the Paralympic Games, which are competitions for disabled athletes.It is the rule that he competes in these games.
Well structured.2. ... legs could help him run faster than natural legs if he had them.3. ... Games where he can ...4.<=???
I don’t think Pistorius should be allowed to compete against able-bodied athletes.First, the lastest improving technology is more better and better.Thanks to new technology’s power, they could run fast.Second, it doesn’t seem to be fair with extra tool that ordinary people aren’t.I think it’s fair to be under the same condition.
Well structured.2. First, technologies are improving day by day. (NOT more better!!!)3. => He could run faster as technology gives him more advantage.4. ... seem fair to use ... that ... don't have.
I don't think he should be allowed to compete against able body athletes.He was allow to compete Olympic game by officials.They agreed that equpiment does not produce power but his upper body.It is difficult for dis able athletes to play sports like ordinary people,but they trained a lot.Competing sport should be fairly.
Not sure which opinion you want to explain.2. was allowed to ...3. ... not provide extra advantage.4. ???5. Sports should be competed fairly.
I don't think Pistorius should be allowed to compete against able-bodied athletes'His prastic legs are different from able-bodied athelets' legs so he may be advantageous in the rase. Nowadays, technology of making prastic legs is developing.If technoligy is more developing, it helps him run more faster than before.
Good reasoning.2. prastic <=?????3. technologies to make ... improving day by day.4. ... run faster (NOT more faster)