Rohingya crisis Growing up in the world's
largest refugee camp
=> Proposal: Other countries should accept the
Rohingya and other refugees in accordance with the UN budget contribution.
Do
you agree with the proposal? Write your answer in four to six sentences.
I do not agree with the proposal.If this proposal has done, some country will not pay the UN budget contribution to not accept refugees. The US pays a lot of money to the UN and accepts one of the number of refugee in the world but Japan accepts very few refugees even the pays a lot of money to the UN so Japan might decrease the amount of money. But I think the country which pay a lot of money to the UN should accept the refugees because they are not poor.
返信削除Pay attention to verbs.
削除#2 ... is approved, ... contribution to avoid accepting refugees.
#3 Write in two sentences.
#4 Explain more about your idea. Do NOT bring in another thought.
I do not agree with the proposal.If this proposal is approved, some country will not pay the UN budget contribution to not accept refugees. There are two kinds of country which pays a lot of money to the UN such as the US and Japan. The US pays a lot of money to the UN and accepts one of the big number of refugees in the world but Japan accepts very few refugees even the pays a lot of money to the UN. So, if this proposal has done, Japan might decrease the pays to keep accept less refugees. If this happens in real, the UN won't get much money to administration.
削除I don't think other countries should accept the Rohingya and other refugees in accordance with the UN budget contribution.
返信削除A lot of contribution doesn't mean that there is a enough room for Rohungya and other refugees.
Japan, for instance, is a very small country and has little money even though contribution to UN is the third largest in the world.
Especially now many countries are in the hard economic situation because of the Corona Shock.
Also, we have little knowledge about Rohungya, so it's dangerous to accept them easily to the county which citizens don't have enough knowledge about it.
For two reasons, I don't agree with the idea.
#2 ... budget contribution ... is enough room ...
削除#3 For instance, Japan ...
Why can you say "has little money"?
#4 Also, ... <= This is a different explanation from #3.
#5 Finally,
#6 Revise
I don't agree with this proposal.
削除A lot of budget contribution doesn't mean that there is enough room for Rohungya and other refugees.
Especially now many countries are in the hard economic situation because of the Corona Shock.
Also, we have little knowledge about Rohingya, so it's dangerous to accept them easily to the county which citizens don't have enough knowledge about it.
Other countries should not accept the Rohingya and other refugees.
返信削除I have two reasons. First, if other countries accept the refugees it would be difficult for other countries people.
Second if the population increases year by year they would face food shortage.
Combine #1 and #2 as TS.
削除#3 ... it will make the lives of those countries difficult.
#4 Also, those countries may face ...
Other countries should not accept the Rohingya and other refugees.
削除If other countries accept the refugees it will make the lives of those countries difficult.
Also, those countries may face food shortage.
I disagree with the proposal.
返信削除There are a lot of difficulties to accept the refugees such as the difference of religion, the location of the country.
The difference of religion or culture has possibility to cause the confusion like terrorisms.
To avoid these problems, we should find the country which is located near the refugees’ country, has the similar culture and has some budget instead.
#2 ... difference in ..., cultures, and living environment.
削除#3 These differences could cause ... to whom?
#4 There are places near by that share the same ...
I disagree with the proposal.
削除There are a lot of differences in religion, cultures, and living environment.
These differences could cause some dangers such as conflicts.
There are places near by that share the same religion or similar culture, so we should find the country to accept the refugees to come in to avoid these problems.
I didn’t agree with this proposal.
返信削除It is difficult to accept Rohingya in a country where one race is the majority of the population such as Japan.
People in that country definitely feel uncomfortable and I don’t think it’s comfortable environment for the Rohingya either.
It’s less trouble to live in a country of mixed races with more Rohingya.
#3 => If a large number of refugees are sent to such countries, both the residents and the refugees feel uncomfortable to live together.
削除#4 They should be sent to a place where ...
I don’t agree with this proposal.
削除It is difficult to accept Rohingya in a country where one race is the majority of the population such as Japan.
If a large number of refugees are sent to such countries, both the residents and the refugees feel uncomfortable or live together.
They should be sent to a place where many races are mixed.
I don’t agree with the proposal.
返信削除Japan can’t afford to accept eight point five percent of Rohingya people.
It means about eighty five thousand Rohingya people come to Japan, and they cause many problems among the local people..
Russia has much larger field than Japan but it will accept only two point four percent of Rohingya people.
For these reasons, it’s not the best way to help them.
Wrote a TS: A larger country in space should take more ...
削除#2 Why Japan?
For example, Japan ...
#3 If 85,000 ..., they will/could ..
#4 On the other hand, Russia has ... and can take more than ...
I don’t agree with the proposal which is a larger country in space should take more Rohingya people.
削除Many countries can’t afford to accept them for example, Japan.
If 85,000 Rohingya people come to Japan, they will cause many problems among the local people.
On the other hand, Russia has much lager field than other countries and can take more than 2.4 percent of Rohingya people.
For these reasons, it’s not the best way to help them.